Sir, Being is not about “being” as in “beings”; rather, Being is the “being” of “beings”. Because “to be” is given, but Being goes beyond just “being”.

Oh Ateneo Philo. How I love thee. It looks confusing, but it makes a lot of sense. =)) I wasn’t the smartest Philo student back in college (duuuude, I never got a higher grade than a  C+). I only made sense of them confuzifying terms after I graduated. =))